How We Score

BRAF Methodology

The Bitcoin Risk Assessment Framework — a custom 5-dimension scoring model designed for the unique characteristics of a decentralized, adversarial network.

Why Not Standard FMEA?

Classic FMEA (Failure Mode and Effects Analysis) was designed for manufacturing processes with predictable failure modes. Bitcoin has properties that standard FMEA does not capture well:

Standard FMEA's three dimensions (Severity × Occurrence × Detection) don't capture speed or permanence. We added two dimensions and recalibrated the formula accordingly.

The Five Dimensions

DimNameWhat It MeasuresScaleHigher = ?
S Severity Impact on Bitcoin's core properties: immutability, decentralization, scarcity, censorship resistance, security 1–10 Worse
P Probability Likelihood of occurrence within a 10-year window 1–10 Worse
D Detectability How covert the failure is. Inverted from standard FMEA — higher means sneakier 1–10 Worse (sneakier)
R Reversibility Permanence of damage once the failure occurs 1–10 Worse (more permanent)
V Velocity Speed of cascade once the failure is triggered 1–10 Worse (faster)

The BRPN Formula

BRPN = S × P × ( (D + R + V) / 3 )

Why this formula?

Realistic Bitcoin risks score between 80 and 280 — no entry in our dataset currently reaches 300+, which would require simultaneously maximal severity, high probability, and poor characteristics across all three secondary dimensions.

Risk Tiers

TierBRPN RangeDescription
🔴 Critical 250 – 1000 High severity AND high probability, poorly characterized (covert, permanent, or fast). Demands immediate attention and active mitigation.
🟠 High 150 – 249 High severity with moderate probability, or moderate severity that is hard to detect or reverse. Requires monitoring and planned mitigations.
🟡 Medium 75 – 149 Meaningful risk that warrants awareness and periodic review. Not immediately alarming but should not be ignored.
🟢 Low 1 – 74 Well-controlled, low probability, or low severity. Monitor occasionally.

Scoring Anchors

To ensure consistency across entries, each dimension uses calibrated anchors:

Severity (S)

  • 1–2: Temporary degradation, no lasting impact
  • 3–4: Noticeable impairment, days/weeks to recover
  • 5–6: Core property compromised, months to recover
  • 7–8: Fundamental property severely compromised
  • 9–10: Existential — Bitcoin ceases to function as designed

Probability (P) — 10-year window

  • 1–2: Theoretical — doesn't exist yet
  • 3–4: Possible but requires extraordinary conditions
  • 5–6: Plausible given current trajectory
  • 7–8: Likely if current trends continue
  • 9–10: Near-certain absent intervention

Detectability (D) — inverted

  • 1–2: Immediately visible to all participants
  • 3–4: Detectable by monitoring within hours
  • 5–6: Requires forensic analysis, days to detect
  • 7–8: Covert for weeks or months
  • 9–10: Potentially undetectable until catastrophic

Reversibility (R)

  • 1–2: Fully recoverable, no lasting damage
  • 3–4: Mostly recoverable with effort
  • 5–6: Partial recovery, some permanent damage
  • 7–8: Largely irreversible, significant impairment
  • 9–10: Irreversible catastrophic damage

Velocity (V)

  • 1–2: Slow burn — years to fully manifest
  • 3–4: Gradual — months to develop
  • 5–6: Moderate — weeks
  • 7–8: Fast — days to hours
  • 9–10: Instantaneous cascade — minutes or less

Scope: Bitcoin Layer 1 Only

This FMEA covers Bitcoin's base layer protocol only (L1). The following are explicitly out of scope for v1: